Why I Don't Like Paper.li
by Antone Roundy | 5 Comments | Blogging, Product Reviews, Social Media/Networking
Every few days, I see a tweet about the latest edition of somebody or other's Paper.li publication. Occasionally, something I've written shows up in one, and I appreciate that. But do I ever read them? Well, I haven't yet.
Paper.li looks kinda cool -- you mash up all the interesting stuff you've been reading, organize it by topic, and make it look like a newspaper. But there are several flaws in the publishing model.
Boring Headlines
Blogging and copywriting experts hammer on the importance of engaging headlines all the time. The headlines in a Paper.li publication may be engaging, but what's not is the typical tweet announcing a new edition.
"The XYZ Daily is out!"
So what?
I'm sure there are a million new publications out around the world today. Why should I spend any of my precious time on this one? I can see 20 more enticing headlines in my feed reader at this very moment. "The XYZ Daily is out," is about as boring as headlines get.
No Focus
The typical Paper.li publication contains a mix of a bunch of different topics. Some may be interesting to me. Others aren't. So to find the interesting stuff, I'd have to go sifting through the page.
The whole point of reading curated content is that somebody else is sifting through content and just giving you the best bits. They may very well have done a great job of that on 10 different topics, but when they combine 10 topics on one page, and I'm not interested in all of them, they've just undone everything they'd accomplished.
Clutter
Paper.li publications look awfully cluttered to me. 'nuf sed.
Too Much All At Once
Even if each edition were introduced with a great headline, were focused on one topic, and the layout were clean and easy to read, I'd rather get my news in bite-sized servings than all in one big lump.I'd like to be able to bookmark the individual stories that interested me rather than the whole page.
I'd rather be able to link to the individual stories that I think my readers will like.
The Better Alternative
What I'd much prefer is a system where you recommend individual stories with their own headlines, and where, when you publish something of your own (or a commentary on somebody else's content), you tell me about it one story at a time, with it's own headline.
Sound familiar?
Twitter for linking to individual stories. Your own blog for content you write.
Paper.li is like digitizing a print publication and putting it online. The problem is that there are other formats for publishing online that take better advantage of the capabilities of the medium.
March 11th, 2011 at 3:23 pm
Antone,
If I wasn't a Paper.li user I would probably agree with you. I will agree that Paper.li could be better. You are right about the headline.
However you miss a few key points. 1st) Paper.li is a Free service
2) Paper.li provides content and relationship building. I use Hootsuite and manage about 30 Twitter niche accounts. So I can retweet to my various social networks including FB and LinkedIn. I use my own short links and link to any other Paper.li edition page other than the first page. Now you have a different headline and more pictures to use in your post.
3) Paper.li helps build relationships. I can't tell you how many of the people I follow who get mentioned on my Paper.li who in return give a sincere Thank You reply Tweet. I also find that these people begin to follow you if they're not already. These same people also begin to retweet your posts for other tweets. AKA social marketing
4) Did I mention Paper.li is Free content?
5) I am also able to get my personal links and my affiliate sales links on other follower's twitter pages and then read by others.
6) Paper.li is an automated tool and has the potential to go viral. I have had one Paper.li post to be retweeted more than 20 times.
You mentioned the layout of Paper.li. Well the layout is in a newspaper format. Newspapers have multiple topics. It's not a "micro" blog format. It takes several subjects and brings them together based on keywords that the author selects.
All in all, just wanted to post some of the positives of Paper.li
Thanks for the post.
Chuck Woo
http://www.onlinemarketingtools.net
March 11th, 2011 at 3:39 pm
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for you comments. It's always good to have views from both sides of a topic. Not having been hooked by Paper.li myself, I'm sure I've missed it's strong points.
March 14th, 2011 at 3:40 pm
Have you tried Yahoo Pipes?
April 11th, 2011 at 10:40 am
Definitely agree with Chuck Woo here... Paper.li is really good for relationship building.. Many people started following me ever since I started using it, as they are very happy when they are mentioned...
But I guess in the coming days, It might be misused and will be used by a lot of spammers to drive attention to themselves.. Also, paper.li has an option for Facebook and it never worked for me.. Did anyone try it?
July 20th, 2011 at 10:20 am
@Chuck Woo
'4) Did I mention Paper.li is Free content?'
As a publisher this is just what I dont like about paper.li
We have 10 twitter users who add our blog posts to their daily paper.li and I'm starting to ask myself, what's the difference between paper.li and an automated spam-blog?
Like Antone says there's no human filtering, so you end up with a huge mix of content - all automated.
Despite being featured in 10 paper.li's I've never seen a referral visit to our blog or website from paper.li. So where's the benefit to publishers?
I'd like to hear the debate on SEO benefits. I suspect its good for 'social media' signals as you're getting daily mentions on twitter, but with the Panda update its this type of thin, automated resyndicated content that has been thrown down by the big G.
So the links could harm the rankings of the original article.
What do you think?