I've talked before about how some Twitterers follow way too many people. Some do it innocently, feeling obliged to follow anyone who follows them, and others with less noble intentions.


"Fail Whale, meet Fauxlow Fowl"

The problem is that by the time you're following maybe 100 people (much sooner if many of them tweet actively), there's no way you can possibly keep up with all the tweets.

When you reach that point, the "courtesy" of following whoever follows you isn't much of a courtesy anymore -- all your friend is getting out of your follow ("friends" are the people you're following) is a bigger follower count and a less accurate idea of how many people are actually reading what they have to say.

A while back, I got curious -- I wondered how many of my Twitter followers were following too many people (and thus probably never reading my tweets). I didn't want to spend all day clicking through to their profiles and checking their friend counts. So I considered writing a script to scrape the information and report back to me.

Then I remembered that Twitter has an API that I could use to get the data more effeciently. I found a PHP library for working with the Twitter API and got to work.

This morning, I launched a new website that anyone can use to get an idea of how many of their followers are "fauxlowers" (ie. fake followers).

My numbers? A little depressing:

  • Of my 367 followers, 79.2% are fauxlowers (assuming anyone with more than 100 "friends" is a fauxlower -- you can choose the number to use as your threshold).
  • My followers follow an average of 2,778 people each! No way are they reading all their friends' tweets!
  • My median follower is fauxlowing 1,025 people (ie. 50% of my followers follow less than 1,025 and 50% fauxlow more).
  • One of my fauxlowers is fauxlowing 111,109 people.

Now I have to acknowledge that some people who follow thousands of people may actually be reading some of their friends' tweets. That's because there's software that allows you to filter out tweets from "friends" you don't really want to follow.

Reader Comment:
The Rallyverse Blog said:
[...] is, you may have posted to Twitter or Facebook, but you can’t be sure if your message got (a) swallowed up by your followers’ streams on Twitter or (b) ignored entirely by Facebook’s [...]
(join the conversation below)

But doesn't that defeat the purpose of "following" them?