<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS Ethics: Stealing Content or Adding Value?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/</link>
	<description>Advice for Internet Marketers with Ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:06:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-811</guid>
		<description>That makes sense.

BTW, When I said &quot;easy&quot;, I meant that a PHP programmer shouldn&#039;t have any trouble hacking WordPress to make it possible to, for example, exclude some posts from a special RSS feed used only for syndication. There may even be plugins already that would enable that sort of thing. If not, if you&#039;re doing a big syndication deal, hiring somebody to do the programming would be easily affordable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense.</p>
<p>BTW, When I said &#8220;easy&#8221;, I meant that a PHP programmer shouldn&#8217;t have any trouble hacking WordPress to make it possible to, for example, exclude some posts from a special RSS feed used only for syndication. There may even be plugins already that would enable that sort of thing. If not, if you&#8217;re doing a big syndication deal, hiring somebody to do the programming would be easily affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Healy</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-810</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what all the rules entailed (or if he knows about how to mark only certain posts for syndication), but I do know that one rule was that no guest posts could ever be published on his blog. Every blog post had to be written by him and only him. I assume this was to guarantee the quality of the posts that would then be syndicated on the &quot;big name&quot; site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what all the rules entailed (or if he knows about how to mark only certain posts for syndication), but I do know that one rule was that no guest posts could ever be published on his blog. Every blog post had to be written by him and only him. I assume this was to guarantee the quality of the posts that would then be syndicated on the &#8220;big name&#8221; site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

That&#039;s interesting about the restrictions on what he could publish. It&#039;d be easy enough to mark a post as &quot;not for syndication&quot; to automatically exclude content they didn&#039;t want to syndicate. I wonder whether the concern was only about the content that got syndicated, or whether the owners of the other site just didn&#039;t want to be associated with a site that published certain types of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s interesting about the restrictions on what he could publish. It&#8217;d be easy enough to mark a post as &#8220;not for syndication&#8221; to automatically exclude content they didn&#8217;t want to syndicate. I wonder whether the concern was only about the content that got syndicated, or whether the owners of the other site just didn&#8217;t want to be associated with a site that published certain types of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Healy</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Syndication is mostly a good thing, especially when done ethically as you describe. It&#039;s the syndication by splogs (spam blogs) that&#039;s bad.

I know one guy who got a syndication deal with a widely read web site and it came with rules for what he could and could not publish on his blog. Of course, the syndicating site now drives a TON of traffic for him. Pretty cool gig, although I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to do it. :-)

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syndication is mostly a good thing, especially when done ethically as you describe. It&#8217;s the syndication by splogs (spam blogs) that&#8217;s bad.</p>
<p>I know one guy who got a syndication deal with a widely read web site and it came with rules for what he could and could not publish on his blog. Of course, the syndicating site now drives a TON of traffic for him. Pretty cool gig, although I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to do it. :-)</p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfred Joseph</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfred Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-276</guid>
		<description>You made some good points.  I think that if the Syndicated article is in keeping with what and is of a equal or better quality than your post it&#039;s OK.  They will get the desired Google boost and back links for improved SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some good points.  I think that if the Syndicated article is in keeping with what and is of a equal or better quality than your post it&#8217;s OK.  They will get the desired Google boost and back links for improved SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://WhiteHatCrew.com/blog/rss-ethics-stealing-content-or-adding-value/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitehatcrew.com/blog/?p=100#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something ironic for you: I got a trackback from a splog that published an excerpt from this post...surrounded and overwhelmed by 3 AdSense units (about twice as much AdSense as content). No comments or original content of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something ironic for you: I got a trackback from a splog that published an excerpt from this post&#8230;surrounded and overwhelmed by 3 AdSense units (about twice as much AdSense as content). No comments or original content of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

